Hello there!
It has been a very long time after my last blog. I was busy in thinking about this. Ya! A thought into another dimension. Some concepts of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle had been bothering me for the past few days and just like the hot spring erupting from the arctic ice, a new thought occurred into my network of neurons recently. I would like to explain this in the coming sections. I recommend all the physics enthusiasts to go through this topic and give it a thought.
It has been a very long time after my last blog. I was busy in thinking about this. Ya! A thought into another dimension. Some concepts of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle had been bothering me for the past few days and just like the hot spring erupting from the arctic ice, a new thought occurred into my network of neurons recently. I would like to explain this in the coming sections. I recommend all the physics enthusiasts to go through this topic and give it a thought.
The Uncertainty:
According to Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, it is impossible to determine simultaneously the exact position and momentum of a subatomic particle. He uses the Planck's constant and derives the mathematical relation between them. There is another part of the theory: It is impossible to determine the energy and time of a subatomic particle simultaneously. But there is something beyond what these equations of the nature wants us to know. But before that let us pay a visit to Albert Einstein.
Mass, Energy & Relativity:
According to the mass energy equivalence of Einstein, energy of a body is equals to mass times squared the velocity of light. Peeping into the works of relativity, he says that as the velocity of a particle increases, its mass increases and time and length decreases by the given factor which solely depends on the velocity. There is also an assumption as a postulate in the theory of relativity that the velocity of light remains constant in all the inertial frames.
Hope you have been able to digest what I wanted you know before I vomit out my deduction on to your nervous system! All the mentioned above concepts are highly reputed and proven mathematical palaces which no human can dare to challenge. If you are sure that you have understood what has been stated above, take your own time to scratch your head as you read the concepts below. All the best!
My Thought:
Now comes a thought into another dimension! In each of the works especially with that of Einstein's we see that he takes time to be a dimension or direction. But my thoughts were a bit queer. What if I consider that time and energy have a secret relation which Einstein failed to recognize? After thinking for about two weeks I came into this conclusion:
"Energy is inversely related to time. In a given inertial system if the energy is very high, by its nature, time will pass slower in that system, likewise if in a system if energy is minimum, the rate of flow of time is faster"
I think for all the first time readers the thing above in the quotes was like "Bullshit!" But give it a thought! Einstein said that as the velocity of a particle increases, so does its mass because the applied force has no other way to go other than increase its mass or velocity. Increase in mass is naturally increase in energy. Connecting this to the time dilation, we naturally can conclude that as the energy in the system increases, time flow will decrease and it has nothing to do with velocity because velocity is always relative. Give it another thought! What happens at the extreme points???
The birth of a universe and Inversion of Dimension:
Well, the title may seem too far, but this is what I prefer it to call. As I went on thinking better pictures dawned into my mind. In the beginning I'd like to explain the concept of Inversion of Dimension.
Think for a while if I say the statement "The sum total of the energy of the universe is constant" is wrong? You'll all call me a madman. But I take the discussion more seriously. I argue here that the energy of the whole universe is decreasing! Well, this might be hard to think and digest, but I say again, give it a thought! Let me put forward my theory properly of the concept of Inversion of Dimension:
"The total energy of the universe is not constant, but decreasing. This energy is leaking into another dimension. Due to the decreased energy, the rate of flowing of time increases until a point is reached when no energy is left in the current universe and the space reduces to nothingness where the rate of flow of time is infinity (Big Crunch as the physicists prefer to call it). This is called Inversion of Dimension. In the other dimension the energy density in nearly infinity and the space is nearly zero. Due to infinite energy, time will not pass at all. But due to the internal energy pressure at that geometrical point, some amount of energy is leaked in the form of electromagnetic radiation and time begins to pass, creating sudden expansion of the space. (Big Bang as the physicists prefer to call it). This is the birth of the new universe"
If you were unable to catch any of the above information, you are free to mail me on this topic. Feel free. Why not this could have happened? I heard that nothing comes back from a black hole, what if it is the black hole that is emptying the energy into another dimension just to create another baby universe?
I have told you what I have been thinking for the past few days and if you are not really interested in these topic, just forget the above things. But if this hypothesis of mine rings the bell in you, then I am most glad to hear from you! You can mail me to mnkb20@gmail.com or comment in the box! Thank You! :)
M Navneeth Krishna
@mnavneeth
hai navneeth...im a non-science student..i found it like a story for sequel of Christopher Nolan's interstellar...good effort...
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments :)
DeleteBro.. What were u deriving on your desk last night?
ReplyDeleteI saw some photos
I was deriving the very thing which we discussed in the college, you were right!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete