Skip to main content

A Question...

Hello there!

   I am writing this post because I am expecting the viewers of this post to leave me replies or answers for the question I am posting here. This question has been haunting me for the past two years and even the best of my physics lecturers have not been successful in answering me satisfactorily. So, with an expectation that at least one of the viewer might come up with an appropriate answer, I here by present you the question:

Frame 1:

   In the frame one (please note that frame here does not refer to the frame of reference), I come up with the first part of my question. The question is completely related to physics and that too classical and relativistic mechanics.

The first assumption:

 "Suppose I consider an ideal inductor connected to an ideal galvanometer, such that even the most quantum change in the magnetic flux can be detected, it is obvious that any minute change in the magnetic flux linked with the inductor coil, shall induce small amount of current in the inductor-galvanometer circuit."

  If the above situation is true then;

The second assumption:

"The whole setup of inductor-galvanometer circuit is setup on an ideal train in which an observer is situated and at no cost he can see the outer world. The assumption is made such that the train is on the surface of the earth only and has the capacity to move in one dimension with the velocity of light or slower, but can never accelerate or decelerate" 

Frame 2:

   In the second frame (please note that frame here does not refer to the frame of reference), I come up with the second part of the question. Here I am taking into consideration the postulates and outcomes of Special Theory of Relativity.

The postulates:

   According to the postulates of Special Theory of Relativity,
  
"1. The velocity of light remains constant in all the inertial frames;
  2. All the laws of physics are same in all the inertial frames"

    With the help of the second postulate of Albert Einstein, we can conclude that,
"No experiment conducted in within an inertial frame can tell you whether you are moving or not"


Considering both the frames, now comes the question;

The Question:

"Suppose the train (mentioned earlier) is now moving in a particular direction with some velocity, due to the influence of the earth's magnetic field, there is an induction of electro motive force in the galvanometer. The observer inside the train will now come to know that he is moving. But this disagrees with the postulates and outcomes of the relativistic mechanics!"

 Those who come up with a good and reasonable answer, please mail the answer to me: mnkb20@gmail.com. Thank you for reading this!


                                                                                             M Navneeth Krishna
                                                                                             @mnavneeth 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LaserPipe – The snake robot that crawls through pipes and makes welding look easy

Hello there! LaserPipe  is a snake robot that can crawl inside pipes and fix faults in very remote locations. Fixing holes that happen to be located within pipes can prove to be a challenge for even the most experienced welders. This generally is due to the fact that movement is restricted based on the nature of the pipe and the location of the fault. Perhaps the welder’s hand cannot fit into the pipe, or the pipe is located in a very inaccessible location. Given this problem, LaserPipe is an idea that was developed in a collaboration between OCRobotics and TWI Ltd with the aim of eliminating the need for a human to physically weld a fault that is located within a pipe. Unsurprisingly, the attention went to robots. Robots are very efficient when designed properly, but it can be tricky to come up with a robot that can travel within tubes and perform repairs as it goes. Thanks to snake-arm robotics, that challenge can be overcome very easily. The robot moves like a snake, mak
Post a Comment
Read more

Polonium-210, the most lethal chemical element known to man!

Hello there! To those unfamiliar with the bad boys of the periodic table, imagine Polonium as the worst bad guy. In fact he would most likely be the gang leader, considering it  takes less than a microgram of this substance  to constitute a fatal dose. To help you better image exactly how much a microgram is, it is about no larger than a spec of dust. But what exactly makes Polonium so deadly, that even a microgram could take out a healthy human being? Let us back track a bit. Polonium 210 was first discovered as a radioactive chemical element (atomic number 84) in 1898 by Marie Curie. She found it in a source of Uranium and it takes the form of a solid metal with a silver color. Later winning a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her discovery, she also a found another element, radium. They first saw the effects of how dangerous this element was after a lab accident exposed her own daughter to a fatal amount, evoking leukemia, which lead to her death 10 years later. Another scand
1 comment
Read more

Canon EOS 700D - A Review

Hello there,   I have been using Canon EOS 700D a.k.a Rebel T5i for about 6 months now. I thought I could give my review and experience about this camera. This is review completely based on my experience and I have no intentions to over boast the product. I bought Canon EOS 700D 6 months ago through Amazon. The services were nice and I received the product intact. One must note that irrespective of what brand it is, no DSLRs give a sharp and clear image in the beginning itself. This not only happened with me but also my friend who bought Nikon D7200 as well. I don't know the actual reason for this. I bought the camera with the 18-55mm IS 2 with 55-250mm IS 2 lens. In the beginning I thought there was a problem with the DSLR's CMOS sensor, as the images appeared grainy, but ignored it. Later on the camera gave me the performance which exceeded my expectations! I am not a regular photographer. Photography is just my hobby. I love experimenting with different kinds of light
Post a Comment
Read more